This is the headline from the ABC News website:
Hey, they are his daughters. They obviously want to refute the allegations against him. Frankly, I don’t care to even talk about the veracity of Marianne Gingrich’s statements regarding the former Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich. Of course, these women would want to deflect such an accusation:
Kathy Lubbers and Jackie Cushman, Gingrich’s daughters by his first wife, told ABC News Chief Investigative Correspondent Brian Ross they had spoken with their father about Marianne Gingrich’s allegation and that he had assured them he never asked for an open marriage.
There, you see? The daughters are sure it’s not true because their dad told them it wasn’t. Out of curiosity, about how many specific details in Newt’s sex life are his girls privy to?
Of course his daughters would want to defend him from their stepmother. They want to protect their dad (Strangely, the guy who also cheated on his first wife, their mom). But that’s neither here nor there. Basically, this is a sordid story with super-high ick factor that I think just got weirder by having this type of “defense”. Thanks ladies for the unverifiable, self-serving hearsay from your father in refutation of the self-serving, conveniently-timed allegation from your former stepmom.
- Of course Newt’s daughters would know what he gets up to in and out of the sack. That’s why they know Marianne Gingrich is lying … they have viewed the videotape? (please no…)
- Newt’s totally cool with letting his kids field questions about tawdry accusations regarding where he sticks his genitals:
“Now, I’ll let my daughters speak for it… I’m not going to comment beyond that because I’m focused on the big issues that concern the American people…”
Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to consume less drama by watching a Real Housewives show.